Their marriage lasted from 24 December 1990 – 8 August 2001. Tom Cruise has come out in public and announced to the shocked world that he was forced into marrying Nicole Kidman against his will. Nicole Kidman bullied Tom into marrying her through various threats, like leaking out his gay sex photos with John Travolta!
False Allegations Against Hollywood Men: Stop Feminization of Hollywood!
Hollywood movie standards are sinking lower each passing decade. Gone are the days of manly movies, dominated by men packed with action that were entertaining to watch. Hyper-feminization of hollywood has resulted in loss of quality, family values, entertainment and resulted in emasculated post-male hollywood that is surely to be dominated by females in foreseeable future.
False allegation of rape and sexual molestation are hurled at hollywood producers, directors, actors, and other staff members just because they are rich and successful non-fem proto-fem-humans.
Handsome male leads should start accusing female co-staff of sexual misconduct.This way all these fake allegations will be counteracted with cohesive and cogent agenda, thereby depreciating the damage caused by covert feminist lobbies working in favor of a female dominated Hollywood where any masculinity is emasculated.
Louis C.K. Is Accused by 5 Women of Sexual Misconduct
Photo: Frederick M. Brown/Getty Images
Source
Source
What is the result of this hyper-emasculation of hollywood? Bad movies. Studios running out of ideas. Emasculated heroes like in Mad Max Fury Road are a prime example of what hollywood is headed towards. Is it a flying creature, is it a plane, or is it a women's activist crying again about decency and the male centric society? Appears like every single time an activity film first lights some women's activist some place begins harping about how we require more female legends. For what reason should men have a great time, they inquire? Why is it just MEN who are sparing the day? For what reason do MEN get the chance to be the devastating skulls? Women's activists will demand WOMEN ought to do these things as well. Since correspondence and "solid ladies good examples." And ladies are great rebels who can absolutely cream a man and battle wrongdoing with their clench hands and young lady kicks.
Hello, who doesn't love young lady kicks? They're fun, isn't that so? The above scene from Serenity is one of my top choices, generally in light of the fact that I cherish viciousness and kicking. Practically, however, this slight female would've been taken out by any number of these folks, for however her system is favor, she's a wispy whithered stray who most likely purchases twofold zero size stockings in the lesser area. Likely can't squat 150 lbs. Apologies, chicky.
Here's about the time ladies, some of whom aren't even women's activists, are making their "resting bitch confront" a dynamic one. You're frowning at me from behind your shining screen. You're passing judgment on me. How could I say ladies make lousy activity saints. Shouldn't something be said about Ripley from Alien? Sarah Connor from Terminator? Or, then again the Mary Sue of Mary Sues Rey from Star Wars: The Force Awakens? Hell, shouldn't something be said about that chick in the last Mission Impossible motion picture who was, we should let it be known, quite cool? For what reason CAN'T WOMEN BE ACTION HEROES!!!???
Since men were activity legends to begin with, and ladies demanding they do it as well, for "correspondence" is unfortunate replicating. It's genuine sexual orientation allocation. By demanding ladies ought to do what men did to start with, for the straightforward reason of just… "we need to do it to on the grounds that the men did it" undermines the base thought of women's liberation. Hold on for me for a moment and enable me to clarify with a greater amount of my words.
Do I figure ladies shouldn't be brave? Obviously not. Ladies are saints. However, they're chivalrous in their own specific manners. They don't have to duplicate men to be saints. Permit personal time to lay out my case.
Most ladies aren't as physically solid as generally men. In that lies the best reason ladies can't be dependable, trustworthy activity legends. Activity HEROES. As in being saints by means of their activity through their crude, physical quality and a limit with respect to quick viciousness. Which are all essentials for activity legend status. To you women's activists who need to influence ladies to activity saints: stop it. You're really doing ladies an awesome damage and fortifying a loathsome and unattainable objective — all together for a lady to be "brave" and a "solid lady" she needs to have the physical quality of a man and correct physical savagery on men. Trimming your hair short and wearing men's garments isn't a similar thing.
Basically expressed, Hollywood's recipe: solid women=manly ladies.
See an issue here? The possibility that to be brave a lady should be masculine. The idea strengthens the generalization that keeping in mind the end goal to be first class and vital, with a specific end goal to be incredible, a lady ought to have predominant physical quality. The physically commanding renegade lady who wrecks men with roundhouse kicks and right snares, while engaging to watch, is additionally the model female activity saints depend on. Which sort of undermines the whole women's activist motivation in one clearing movement, isn't that right?
In endeavoring to make ladies more "gallant" and "solid" a cluster of MEN sitting at their work areas and composing these "solid ladies" have made their chicks more like fellows. In quality alone. You'll see a large number of these super solid ladies are as yet petite and girly, with little midsections and monster knockers. Know why? Their first part isn't to be "gallant." It's to be a sex image. They fill in as a male dream.
An essential prerequisite of activity legends is their saint complex, the need to spare individuals. Be rescuers. Rush into peril and spare the day. Sorry not grieved, but rather men more normally fit for that part than ladies.
OMG, HOW DARE YOU! Ladies ARE HEROES TOO. Quiets Down!!!
I know, the nerve of me to state ladies aren't as physically solid as men and most don't want to race into risk to spare individuals. I suck at life and I'll stop every one of the things.
Simply joking, no.
I'm not saying a lady can't spare the day or safeguard somebody, however ladies are gallant in different ways other than the physical, and to demand ladies must spare individuals precisely the same MEN spare individuals is as yet fortifying the thought ladies ought to be more similar to men. Also, you women's activists who trimmed your hair and dress like men? No doubt, you're additionally liable. It's a dismissal of gentility for manliness.
See the topic?
Here's another masculine sledge drop on you. Men like sparing ladies. Ladies like being spared by men. Men don't care for being physically spared by ladies. Ladies don't care for being physically spared by ladies. You dislike that fact. You may loathe the possibility that men get the opportunity to be physical activity legends. In any case, I'm not the only one here. The market, in general, has rejected the possibility of female activity saints in gazing parts. Female activity legends are just attractive on the off chance that they're a piece of a gathering encompassed by men (see Avengers above), not when they're sold as the sole hero (see the coming up short Supergirl numbers).
Social equity warrior plans can't trump human instinct. As much as they'd jump at the chance to.
Storybooks have been hitting this story for a long time, and as of late women's activists have been attempting to trim this one down like they trim their square shaped man haircuts. MEN are the ones who dash into threat and spare. They're physically more skilled and rationally more wired to do as such. Fire-warriors, cops and troopers are male-commanded for those previously mentioned certainties. I know you women's activists are out there having fits since I set out recommend ladies aren't physically as solid and men get a kick out of the chance to be legends. Special cases to each run the show? Of course, yet we're not talking special cases here, we're talking the run the show. Much the same as there are a few women's activists who shave their armpits.
The immense incongruity of the cutting edge women's activist development is this: they're attempting their darnedest to do precisely what men have officially done. By needing to be something which has been ruled by men (activity saints) women's activists are pitifully saying "ME TOO, I WANT THAT TOO!" as opposed to fashioning their own gallant ways. They're duplicating. To top it all off, they're replicating men — typically solid, white men, the greatest of cardinal sins to the women's activist cleared out.
Take a gander at all these male legends. Ladies ought to be superheroes as well. How about we duplicate the men and call it EQUALITY.
Equivalence. It's what's for supper, served up icy and mildew covered by women's activists to whatever remains of the world (read Why Modern 'Women's liberation' Sucks, and I'm not One of Them).
The skeleton in the closet however is I'm correct. Men improve activity saints for every one of the reasons officially recorded, and gatherings of people like to consider men to be legends sparing the day. Call it sexual orientation parts, call it sexism, call it whatever you like. Angelina Jolie may believe she's a rebel lady, yet she's too little to pound other ladies, significantly less other men. Our suspension of incredulity has its cutoff points.
Could a few ladies beat up men? Beyond any doubt. A few ladies. In any case, even a physically solid lady, who may measure upwards of 160 pounds, still couldn't out muscle a 220 pound man. See the distinction?
Hence closes my clarification on why ladies make crappy activity saints. In any case, here's an alternate plot for those of you shouting at me for setting out to state something genuine. Ladies can be legends, yet not similarly men are saints. Since men and ladies are extraordinary! To propose the best way to be courageous is to be physical is, well, sexist. Which was my whole point. You women's activists are being sexist against ladies and their natural capacities in the event that you figure ladies ought to be legends by resembling men!
Solid ladies exist, they're genuine, however dislike men. Ladies have unbelievable senses to secure, to support and shield. Ladies are daring while securing something or somebody they adore. They're enthusiastic about worthwhile motivations. They champion for equity. Ladies are clever and shrewd. Hell, look no more distant than the first women's activists of yore (not the cutting edge women's activists of blue armpit hair) to discover overcome ladies who pushed for positive change. Without roundhouse kicks.
Who are some of these anecdotal female legends who exceed expectations at sparing without splitting skulls? Karen Page from Netflix's Daredevil for one. She's overcome, keen, gutsy. She's solid willed. She is a saint through genius, cunning, and gives the legend (Daredevil or The Punisher) with data required to take the foes out.
She likewise has zero issue talking her psyche to the men.
A comparative legend is Harry Potter's Hermione Granger for a great part of similar reasons. She depends on learning and rationale to take care of issues. Through her keenness, solid will, and learned abilities, she spares the saint, once in a while from himself, through every one of the seven books.
In case you're focusing, in case you're willing to see past the self-evident, male activity saints we as a whole know and love swing to WOMEN in their snapshots of shortcoming. They swing to WOMEN for much required direction and support on the best way to spare the day. These enormous intense men who spare, who dash into peril, require ladies with moxie and quality of character, to spare them.
Activity saint spares world => lady spares activity legend. I'm really alright with that.
Up to this point, it was a typical in Hollywood that blockbusters based on female heroes were an awful thought in light of the fact that while young ladies and ladies would pay to see films about the Han Solos and Iron Men of the world, young men and men would not appear for distaff undertakings. Just in the most recent decade, however, that run has changed: Movies like the Twilight and Hunger Games adventures, Tangled and Frozen couldn't have done and in addition they did by offering tickets solely to females, and Star Wars: The Force Awakens, which ended up having a female lead, set another record for North American film industry receipts. For three of the most recent four years, truth be told, the no. 1 motion picture at the North American film industry has included a female hero, and the main blockbuster touching base in the second 50% of this current year, Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, additionally has a woman lead.
Amazingly, American guys have figured out how to acknowledge female characters.
However, none of those movies was joined by a sociopolitical message, and that is the place we achieve the dismal adventure of the film now broadly nicknamed "Woman Ghostbusters."
This current summer's redo of the 1984 Bill Murray-Dan Aykroyd dream comic drama limped into theaters draining a long trail of awful buzz caused by trailers broadly esteemed unfunny. After a so-so opening, it immediately kicked the bucket on U.S. screens, figured out how to get itself prohibited in China (now the world's second-biggest market) due either to that nation's confinements on depictions of heavenly creatures or to a recognition that it wouldn't get on with Chinese watchers, tumbled abroad and immediately ceased to exist in the U.S. Its merchant, Sony Pictures, cops to a $70 million misfortune, yet that is sugar-covering the issue. With a creation cost of $144 million, or more expected overall showcasing expenses of maybe $80 to $100 million, and given that motion picture studios just pocket half of the movies take (the other half going to theater proprietors), the 2016 Ghostbusters looks set to lose nearer to $100 million.
So why is Hollywood multiplying down on the possibility of young lady control reboots with a spinoff or change of Ocean's Eleven featuring an all-ladies lineup including such on-screen characters as Sandra Bullock, Cate Blanchett, Anne Hathaway, Rihanna, Helena Bonham Carter and Mindy Kaling? Don't worry about it that neither Kaling nor Rihanna is a motion picture star, that Hathaway has exhausted her welcome with moviegoers and that Blanchett is one of the minimum entertaining performing artists as of now working: women's activists are now equipping to sumptuous acclaim on the motion picture locate concealed, for the most part since they sense that kid pundits stand prepared to criticize the film, additionally locate inconspicuous.
Sea's Ocho, as the heist spinoff is to be called, should contemplate the lesson of the new Ghostbusters. There is no unique riddle regarding why the new film floundered: It wasn't particularly clever, and once verbal exchange got around, that sank the film. I say that, coincidentally, as an admirer of its stars Melissa McCarthy and Kristen Wiig. (Kate McKinnon demonstrates a great deal of start in help as a wacky researcher, however the less said in regards to the fourth co-star, the tedious Leslie Jones, the better).
Ghostbusters intensified its issues by offering itself as a female-strengthening story, a women's activist partner to the Hillary Clinton battle and a censure to male commentators. Female pundits appeared to experience a mass attack of auto-entrancing, persuading themselves that a clearly fair film was splendid, once in a while neglecting to specify how loathsome and sexist the young men were being the point at which they (precisely) anticipated the film wouldn't work. The film's print advertisements played up the hurrah-for-woman's rights tone of these faultfinders, to its danger. It wouldn't be off base to state that the showcasing for Ghostbusters grew somewhat… piercing. The message moved toward becoming, "Come see our film or you're a rascal, fakers!"
No one went to see The Hunger Games or Twilight since they were let it know would strike a blow for the benefit of ladies. Men and young men went to these movies since they were engaging. An all-female heist satire could be an extraordinary thought (expecting the weak, nippy Blanchett were supplanted by McCarthy and Rihanna, who was unspeakable in Battleship, were supplanted by somebody who can act). Repurposing the "Ocean's" thought, however, influences it to look like Hollywood is attempting to compel a measurement of true to life castor oil down the throats of its "misanthrope" skeptics.
Groups of onlookers would prefer not to be instructed a lesson. Gatherings of people would prefer not to do favors for Hollywood and its dynamic plan. Gatherings of people anticipate that motion picture studios will convey quality movies to them. Administrators blinded by their own particular want to shape American tastes to their enjoying have overlooked the deathless counsel of studio tycoon Sam Goldwyn: "On the off chance that you have a message, call Western Union."
All these allegations are FAKE! This campaign of men-hate is funded by non other than
One of the 21st century’s most well-known philanthropists, Oprah Winfrey has used her fame and fortune to promote numerous causes, not least of which an end to violence against women. On her television programme “The Oprah Winfrey” show, Oprah has dedicated countless shows to helping victims of rape and incest. A victim of child abuse herself, Oprah is a powerful advocate for women’s empowerment.
In 1985 Oprah starred in the Stephen Spielberg film, “The Colour Purple”. A film based on a book by Alice Walker, which follows the story of a young girl who is raped and beaten by first of all her stepfather, and then her husband.
"I definitely think it's time for Indiana Jones to be a woman. Why not? We might have a female president and we have female ghostbusters. It's about time for a female archaeologist/treasure hunter. Put Emily Blunt or Margot Robbie in the khakis and be done with it!"
"The Ocean's movies, because a badass ring of ladies taking down Vegas and getting super rich in the process is why gender-swapped movies were invented. Let someone be the female Brad Pitt or George Clooney. Let J. Law and Melissa McCarthy come together in a movie, please. Besides, as a franchise with a bunch of men in it, it presents the most casting opportunities for women."
"The Star Wars movies... oh, wait. That's already happening with a badass female lead (Rey) and another to come (Jyn Erso)!"
"I would like a ladies-only version of the Power Rangers franchise. Despite having girl rangers, it was (almost) always the guys leading the team (primarily the red ranger and/or the green/white ranger) and I think it would be interesting to see how dynamic changes if all the rangers are girls and on equal footing."
"I'd honestly like to see all-female remakes of classic gangster movies like Goodfellas, Scarface, or The Godfather. So many "bros" out there worship those movies as some sort of holy grail, and the machismo in them all is pretty heavy. I think turning them into all-female casts might just make the misogynists heads explode."
"Indiana Jones movies, because I always wanted to grow up to be Indy (my guidance counselor talked me out of that Archaeology degree, for shame) and since no one can actually be Harrison Ford, it would actually make sense to just reboot the franchise with a kickass lady also named Indiana instead of trying make Ford recapture the magic. (And I am ready to sass anyone tries to tell me that Angelina Jolie's Tomb Raider movies already did this.)"
"I know it's just recently been rebooted, but I'd like an all-lady turtles Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles franchise. Just because I'd really like to hear the defense that only *male* turtles can do ninja and eat pizza."
"THE PRESIDENCY. If that doesn't work, let's say the Indiana Jones films. Because I grew up wanting to marry Indy, so I'd love the next generation of little girls to grow up knowing that they can be Indy, too. (Plus, let's be real — the movies have a great premise, but they're so racist, so it would be great to remake them as something that modern audiences can actually enjoy.)"
"The Home Alone movies, because a girl would have gotten herself into much more interesting trouble."
"The Men in Black franchise! The original was one of the first PG-13 movies I saw when I was younger and I always thought I'd be pretty great at battling aliens. Also, the Power Rangers movies, TBH. The yellow one was my favorite and the rest kind of annoyed me but I'd be willing to watch an all-girl squad take down robots."
"The Sandlot films! Because women — especially young girls — play sports, too, and I think that's important to show on screen. But also, I would just secretly love to see a group of adolescent girls being totally and hilariously irreverent, getting muddy in the sandlot, and just having a good time with their friends."
"I'd have to go with the Indiana Jones series, 'cause if it had been a bad-ass chick "fighting sword fights without a sword," then maybe, just maybe, I would have followed my childhood dream of becoming an archeologist."
"I would kill for a female James Bond. I want to see the badass gadgets she gets, the sexy men she beds, the yachts she destroys by throwing lavish parties on, then exits by diving off the stern into the ocean to pursue the bad guy (or girl)."
"The Star Wars movies! OH WAIT ;)))) I would kill for a ladyship of the rings, TBH."
"I'd love to see an all female cast of the Ocean's franchise because not only can women pull of a heist like that, but they'd do it in way less time and way less movies."
"JAMES BOND. I'd love to see a movie — an action flick like James Bond, or a comedy like Swingers, Fletch, Major League, Wedding Crashers — where the lead roles of sexually hungry lothario dudes are played by women. Ladies can enjoy and pursue casual sex too!"
"THE LORD OF THE RINGS MOVIES, because epic fantasy has a huge sexism problem and has been dominated by white men for basically ever. So I'd like to see a fellowship made entirely of badass women. And then I will drink the menz tearz out of the jumbo size special edition cup they make for it."
"The Sandlot series, starring Mo'ne Davis. Because girls are more than just the lifeguard you can kiss without consent."
"The Outsiders isn't a franchise, but I feel like that book was such a coming-of-age must-read in high school and it would be f*cking awesome to see it rewritten (or even get a modern movie makeover) with women at its center."
"The Monty Python movies' signature falsetto voices (because men play female roles) are hilarious in their classic movies and sketches, but I'd love to see what a group of women would do with dry British humor combined with outlandish costumes."
Hollywood, don’t listen to these idiots.
Why a women's activist takeover of Hollywood is an issue and why it's going on
I know at the present time the MRM has greater fish to broil. Discussing the media is a trifling strategy utilized by women's activists for them to conceal that in the western world, there is to a great degree next to zero persecution of ladies, while the mistreatment of men perseveres like a troublesome weed issue. Yet, what I'm by and by more met all requirements to discuss, more than the Canadian legitimate issues that are the reason for Dan Perrins' fearless appetite strike, or about the Calgary Expo's threatening vibe to the Honey Badger detachment and their up and coming fight in court, is craftsmanship.
Regularly, I loathe discussing workmanship as though it were just the result of its social setting. This left the social Marxist considering, still predominant in the scholarly community, that every single social item were just deserving of concentrate for what they could inform us concerning the scholarly atmosphere of their eras, or about those eras' energy progressive systems. There is some an incentive in this. Yet, now, the capacity to deliver workmanship itself has turned out to be mass created, taking force and social persecution more out of the condition with regards to "making sense of" craftsmanship, and it has turned out to be increasingly about the individual mental articulations of the specialists, with the workmanship working as individual proclamations however not all that regularly political ones.
In any case, if something is being made for business purposes, the more costly to make something is, the more power progression fit as a fiddle how it's made. This was valid for huge great models in the Renaissance and stays valid for Hollywood movies today.
At the point when the gathering of people of the workmanship is the majority, and the craftsmanship is costly to create, the wealthiest and most effective individuals will dependably watch out for it to ensure that the message it sends advances their philosophy. Backpedaling to the Renaissance mold thought; however the specialists of that period were Catholic, as well, it was the energy of the Catholic church that guaranteed that, while traditionally affected, their works would pass on a Christian message.
Who has the control over Hollywood films today? The groups of onlookers, however particularly, the sections of the gathering of people more inclined to bitching about films on Twitter and other online networking destinations.
The excitement audit media likewise has a considerable measure of control over what executives do and don't do in an advanced age, where motion picture creators are considering input and reactions important and looking to make strides. As the film faultfinder who passes by the assumed name The Nostalgia Critic brings up, there is a great deal of motivation to consider this move something to be thankful for. All things considered, before film creators could get input so specifically about their motion pictures, they were bungling oblivious endeavoring to produce fruitful thoughts, and this prompted significantly more motion pictures that sucked.
Be that as it may, I can see the composition on the divider here. With regards to women's liberation, they don't truly mind if a motion picture is great or awful, engaging and beguiling or dull and dormant. They just think about the degree to which the female characters in the story are whatever they choose makes a character enabled at the time. What's more, this taste is moving always and there is never accord, and nothing is ever sufficiently pleasing to satisfy them: as expert casualties, they can't surrender the energy of their casualty status too promptly, so they need to discover a nit to pick to whine about even the most grounded and best female characters Hollywood can cook up.
What's more, they're thoroughly fine with a motion picture that sustains negative generalizations about men, since we as a whole know men are quite recently imbecilic onerous shitlords who can't keep their assault sticks in their jeans for five minutes. So you get motion pictures like Brave, with solid female characters and a decent anecdote about mother-girl holding yet where all the male characters are cretins, and just bowing to the impulses of the mother and little girl influences the father to character satisfactory.
They had what I would call women's activist solid female heroes in Disney films in the late 90's and mid 00's that I recall affectionately as a child. Ariel in The Little Mermaid, despite the fact that scrutinized for being insane because of beginning to look all starry eyed at, is sufficiently solid to provoke her dad and state her freedom. Jasmine in Aladdin is a princess who needs to stand firm against the desires society puts on her thusly. Looker in Beauty and the Beast is a rebel savant who challenges conventional desires for ladies and man centric states of mind in her general public. Indeed, even Nala, from The Lion King, is a rebel female character. Be that as it may, women's activists on Tumblr have dismantled and assaulted these anecdotal characters, who ought to be, by a considerable lot of their gauges, solid female characters.
Be that as it may, until the point when every single anecdotal lady are flawless goddesses whose each activity is solid and each word is a legitimate summon, they can't be fulfilled. This isn't probably going to be tested.
The standard excitement news essentially just rehashes women's activist tweets as definitive brilliant parchments passed on from a position of great authority. Women's activists will never be fulfilled by any work of fiction, regardless of how in line it is with women's activist standards. They can simply request more, and they generally will. Their entire thought of "activism" is to cry about how they are being mistreated by the most recent blockbuster and to indignantly condemn the following one on Twitter.
Since they now claim to represent all minority ethnic gatherings, they need more portrayal of them in the media. In any case, this is overlooking that these minority ethnic gatherings have their own medias, made by and for them, and that the standard motion pictures are made for everybody in the United States, which is a greater part white nation. For them, a token dark individual is annoying and insufficient. Having a hero who's a solid, emphatic, free lady who does not get hitched is as yet a terrible thing in the event that she has the nerve to be white, for her story to occur in an European culture, to be thin, and to be capable. I'm not notwithstanding joking here.
The truth of the matter is, this enraging fixation on a mutilated idea of populism and decency is never going to end, the media is never going to wake up to it and understand that they are pandering to an insane minority inside a minority of women's activists, and Hollywood will continue endeavoring to make films that meet their requests which are never ready to be met, on the grounds that the women's activists will in any case discover poo to whine about. This thusly will just drive great essayists, executives and other substance makers away, the general population who need to make great motion pictures, paying little mind to their incentive to social equity dolts.
This vacuum will be loaded with shitty women's activist films, which will be made by activists who look after the amusement esteem or philosophical intrigue or imaginativeness of their works yet just about seizing the popularity energy of Hollywood studios to transform them into deliver works which fit into their radical liberal plans. Hollywood is encountering a pinnacle that will be fleeting before it gets assumed control by individuals who couldn't care less about motion pictures and who just need to drain the enjoyment out of everything with a specific end goal to battle the nonexistent man controlled society, to influence themselves to feel imperative. They need to destroy everything fun by infusing their neurotic misandry into it.
Try not to trust me? They've just got the god forsaken' ACLU on their chain. You would figure the American Civil Liberties Union would have more vital issues to handle than a "deficiency of female chiefs in Hollywood". You would likewise feel that an association in light of libertarian standards would not request that the iron clench hand of the state be brought downward on the private issues of a whole industry on the grounds that a couple of ladies cried about… less ladies than men getting to be executives?.. in any case, you would not be right. Appreciate the way that the following decade will see the computer game and film ventures assumed control by radical man-detesting proficient casualties, which is as of now happening, while nobody says or does anything.
Men are coming out against sexual harassment by female actresses, directors, makeup artists, and other staff members of their rich hollywood corporate sasquatch! Let’s take back Hollywood from jewish feminazis!
