Most religions of the world consider sex a low level desire, and mothers are worshiped as literal gods, or god like beings, who give us birth and existence in this world. Contrary to God/Universe/Nature respecting the godly status of females by giving them the capability to grant us life through their pineal glands ergo third eye, they suffer the humiliation & pain of giving us birth through nine months of sex and then further suffering through painful childbirth through their private parts.
The considerable greatness of sexual fixation, mishandle, and embarrassment in factions likely emerges from the outrageous level of religious infantilism cultivated among their supporters, going crazy on account of the developmental hack at the center of these feelings. Be that as it may, the unprecedented power and control employed by clique pioneers are likewise fundamental components, and these get generally from the social foundation of religion.
Third Eye - Pineal Gland
The pineal gland (also called the pineal body, epiphysis cerebri, epiphysis or the "third eye") is a small endocrine gland. It produces melatonin, a hormone that affects the modulation of wake/sleep patterns and photoperiodic (seasonal) functions. It is located near to the center of the brain between the two hemispheres, tucked in a groove where the two rounded thalamic bodies join. Unlike much of the rest of the brain, the pineal gland is not isolated from the body by the blood-brain barrier system. It is reddish-gray and about the size of a pea (8 mm in humans).
The pineal gland is shaped like a tiny pine cone, hence its name.
Pine Cone Pineal Gland
Pseudoscience Theories
While the physiological function of the pineal gland has been unknown until recent times, mystical traditions and esoteric schools have long known this area in the middle of the brain to be the connecting link between the physical and spiritual worlds. Considered the most powerful and highest source of ethereal energy available to humans, the pineal gland has always been important in initiating supernatural powers. Development of psychic talents has been closely associated with this organ of higher vision.
The third eye controls the various bio-rhythms of the body. It works in harmony with the hypothalamus gland which directs the body's thirst, hunger, sexual desire and the biological clock that determines our aging process. When it "awakens", one feels a pressure at the base of the brain.
The pineal gland's location deep in the brain seems to intimate hidden importance. In the days before its function as a physical eye that could see beyond space-time was discovered, it was considered a mystery linked to superstition and mysticism. Today it is associated with the sixth chakra.
Chakras - Spiraling Wheels or Cones of Energy
12 Around Spiraling Cones of Creation
All-Seeing-Eye
It's about the Eye, Zero Point, focusing your consciousness and trusting what you see. You do it all the time and may not beware of the difference between your thoughts and those from higher frequency. I was told that the third eye has a lens that opens to see behind physical reality, so you might want to relate to that theory. When the third eye opens it can feels like a pressure at the base of the brain. We all want to be more psychic and increase the connection with the other side as our Consciousness Hologram closes and souls return to light. We want to empower and most of all to understand beyond the physical. Meditation, Visualization, Yoga, and all forms of Out of Body Experiences help.
“Most importantly, this isn't a declaration that we're having a child. How about we get that off the beaten path front and center. Alright? No child yet. Believe me, if/when there's uplifting news to partake in this division I will yell it from the peak!
Yet, as the greater part of you know, we are attempting. What's more, in spite of the fact that we've been endeavoring to hold things on the down-low where Will is concerned, that is marginally difficult to do when he sees father giving mother shots consistently. So we disclosed to him the nuts and bolts — mother and father are heading off to the specialist so he can enable us to give Will another infant sibling or sister. In spite of the fact that we attempted to temper his desires because of a paranoid fear of frustrating him, that is entirely difficult to do since 4.5-year-olds escape before long.
The principal question he had was strategic. He knows babies develop in a lady's tummy, however he was confounded about how they show up into the world. To straighten something up, we asked him where he thought babies make their exit.
"All things considered, the infant develops in mumma's tummy and after that when it's a great opportunity to be conceived the child slides down and mumma craps it out of her butt."
See, you can't blame his rationale. It makes sense. Furthermore, the snorting clamor he made when discussing the infant being crapped out was truly the cherry over that crazy sundae. Be that as it may, despite the fact that the possibility of releasing him through life thinking babies turn out a lady's derriere was enticing, we figured we should set him straight. So we let him know — in an obvious certainty tone — that children make their escape by means of a lady's vagina.
His reaction will perpetually live in notoriety:
"No dada! The infant needs to turn out the butt. Mother's vagina isn't sufficiently huge to fit an infant however her bum is!"
He has his dad's way with words.”
Sex is characteristically truly sickening: natural liquids all over, abnormal smells and considerably more interesting clamors—but then all around we as a whole pretty much figure out how to appreciate it. This exchange off between needing to imitate and needing to stay away from real emissions shows an intriguing test for development and has brought about an intricate connection between being turned-on and earned out.
To comprehend the connection amongst sex and appall we initially need to realize what nauseate is and what it does. Sicken has for quite some time been viewed as an all inclusive feeling (Darwin, 1872/1965; Plutchik, 1962; Tomkins and McCarter, 1964), and the outward appearances related with nauseate (think spoiled nose, unmistakably pulling endlessly, limited eyes to stay away from the hostile jolt) are perceived all around (Ekman and Friesen, 1975). In light of the consistency in outward appearances of the feeling, early speculations of nauseate's utility identified with the oral dismissal of toxic substances (Ekman and Friesen, 1975; Rozin and Fallon, 1987; Tomkins, 1962). In like manner, sicken is related with queasiness and spewing. This all bodes well, however is by all accounts missing a huge bit of the astound. Lethal and foul tasting substances can inspire sicken reactions, yet we likewise ordinarily encounter disturb as a response to sexual transgressions and improper conduct, and in addition reacting to material encounters like coming into contact with puppy crap.
Some contemporary ways to deal with appall, and numerous different feelings, utilize a transformative point of view (Cosmides and Tooby, 2000; Keltner, Haidt, & Shiota, 2006; Ohman and Mineka, 2001; Pinker, 1998). This stems from the way that our feelings are capable behavioral sparks that conceivable developed as a reaction to particular and inescapable versatile issues in our tribal condition. In light of this approach, disturb is considered to have various unmistakable areas including pathogen and sexual segments.
A tremendous group of scholastic research recognizes pathogen sicken as a powerful spark of staying away from potential wellsprings of disease. Pathogen nauseate likely developed because of the enormous weight that was set on survival, and surely propagation, by ailment. Irresistible organisms have been a reliable wellspring of peril for primates, and keep on being today, particularly for those in creating countries. Pathogen sicken therefore works as a behavioral invulnerable framework, inspiring the living being to maintain a strategic distance from contact with potential sickness vectors that would require a physiological resistant reaction. Sex, while fundamental (and fun), likewise conveys a gigantic danger of introduction to potential pathogens, including some especially awful bugs notwithstanding the standard range of diseases go from individual to individual. The compulsion to engage in sexual relations with hazardous mates can be enhanced by appall, and in this setting pathogen and sexual sicken work in a comparative way.
Pneumonic veno-occlusive sickness (PVOD) - Case 269 by Yale Rosen/Flickr Innovative Lodge
Source: Pneumonic veno-occlusive sickness (PVOD) - Case 269 by Yale Rosen/Flickr Innovative Lodge
Sexual sicken is one of a kind in any case, in that it can likewise deter us from bedding down with individuals who aren't ailing by any stretch of the imagination. Say, our nearby hereditary relatives. Inbreeding improves the probability of hurtful latent ailments—an undeniable impair to any life form. The idea alone of participating in intercourse with a kin or parent is really upsetting, and is likely an aftereffect of our developed limit with regards to sexual sicken to dishearten this very conduct.
As per Tybur, Lieberman, & Griskevicius (2009), sexual nauseate may likewise have developed to rouse the shirking of other expensive sexual practices like contributing time, exertion and assets into procuring poor mates (i.e. those with poor qualities, an inclination to stray, or a powerlessness to give). Thus, the lower a person's sexual appall is, the more probable they are to take part in unsafe, here and now sexual connections (Al-Shawaf, Lewis, and Buss, 2014; Tybur, Inbar, Güler, and Molho, 2015). Given that the cost of a poor-mate is higher for females because of the levels of popularity of incubation and raising posterity (which guys may well avoid), females have a tendency to have altogether more elevated amounts of sexual appall (Tybur, Bryan, Lieberman, Caldwell Hooper, and Merriman, 2011) and are more consider in mate decision (see Trivers, 1974). It appears just as we ought to be always earned out by the danger of contracting appalling infections, or much more terrible, shocking children from everyone we meet. So for what reason don't we encounter sicken with a few people and how are we ready to engage in sexual relations with them?
There are a wide range of things that go into being pulled in to somebody, yet physical fascination may really be identified with well being. Things like facial allure, body shape and symmetry have been found to relate to different measures of ailment protection (Grammer, Fink, Møller, & Thornhill, 2003; Singh, 1993; Thornhill and Gangestad, 1993, 2006). When we discover somebody we're into bigly, our body chooses that the danger of infection is justified, despite all the trouble to attempt and make a child (Koukounas and McCabe, 1997; Vonderheide and Mosher, 1988).
To explore this theory, analysts from the College of Groningen had female members observe some attractive recordings and do some gross stuff like drink out of a glass with a bug in it. Another gathering of members viewed a video of outrageous games, while a third gathering struck out and were stuck watching an exhausting motion picture about a prepare (Borg and de Jong, 2012). The females who had watched sensual recordings evaluated sex-related jolts as less disturbing and performed a greater amount of the appalling behavioral errands. Sexual excitement really brought about the down-direction of appall in readiness for intercourse. This may point to a mutual cause of sexual and pathogen sicken which were later refined by one of a kind specific weights.
This examination additionally affirms that disturb and excitement are contradictory physiological and mental encounters and with regards to picking between the two, we appear to support sex. All things considered, survival is negligible to advancement without proliferation. What's more, who could point the finger at us when sex has advanced to be so darn fun?
For what reason does God need us to mangle our private parts, and particularly those of our youngsters? For what reason does the maker of this unendingly huge universe think such a great amount about what we do with our sexual organs as grown-ups? Why is desire viewed as evil? Why was Jesus conceived of a virgin, and, as per Catholics, his mom moreover? For what reason did the early Shakers hone abstinence, as well as move bare? For what reason do religious fundamentalists contradict premature birth, as well as the best methods for preventing it, contraception? For what reason do TV ministers rage about the shades of malice of infidelity, explicit entertainment, masturbation, sex, and homosexuality, just to be gotten off guard doing precisely those things? Why is religion so fixated on sex?
My answer, obviously, includes the transformative hack that conflates infantile, maternal, and sexual love. I have contended that a natural neural model of the mother primes an infant to expect a genuinely cherishing other. This model offers a similar instrument of alliance and enthusiastic responsibility—what we usually call love—that in grown-ups is key to maternal providing care and sexual match holding. It likewise fills in as a layout for other social connections and is an establishment for a unique sort of learning fundamental to the development of those connections. These snares not just safeguard the persistence of the intrinsic model into adulthood, yet in addition cause intriguing issues once adulthood arrives.
One of these is weakness to confidence in divinities that maximally energize the intrinsic model under the correct conditions, particularly those of childish powerlessness and distress. As the center of an adherent's religious love of God, the inborn model hues religious involvement with puerile feelings. The all the more seriously devout the devotee turns out to be, nonetheless, the more noteworthy the hazard that these feelings will overflow into different parts of the transformative hack. The sparkles truly fly when the childish feelings of religious enthusiasm break the levee and fill sexual domain. Like the suckling male newborn child with his conspicuous erection, the on a very basic level puerile experience of God's essence goes up against an ambiguously sexual quality, as in this well known portrayal by Saint Teresa of Avila of her mystical joy on account of a celestial guest:
In his grasp I saw an incredible brilliant lance, and at the iron tip there had all the earmarks of being a state of flame. This he dove into my heart a few times so it entered my insides. When he hauled it out, I felt that he brought them with it, and left me totally devoured by the immense love of God. The agony was severe to the point that it influenced me to absolute a few groans. The sweetness caused by this serious agony is extreme to the point that one can't in any way, shape or form wish it to stop, nor is one's spirit at that point content with anything however God. This isn't a physical, yet an otherworldly agony—however the body has some offer in it—even an impressive offer.
Maybe this is not out of the ordinary, considering that novitiates are informed that their abstinent life to come is the cost paid for the benefit of being married to Christ. In any case, chaste nuns are not by any means the only ones whose picture of God is painted in sexual shades. Consider this section from Baptist evangelist Lee Roy Shelton Sr.:
On the off chance that He is my Beloved, at that point I AM HIS BELOVED. As a result of His awesome love for me, He descended from paradise, took me by the hand, and requested that me one day be His; and He promised me to Himself . . . It was elegance upon beauty when I reacted to Him saying, "Truly, indeed, my Lord. I am Thine, and Thine until the end of time." Then our engagement was culminated and the obligation of our union was fixed; and it is most valuable and interminably authoritative upon each other . . . At that point won't it be beauty upon elegance when the marriage day breaks, and I accompany every other holy person to the marriage dinner inclining upon His arm to ever be with Him as the lady of the hour is with the husband, where there will be completion of bliss and delights forevermore!
Scarcely an early supporter for same-sex marriage, Shelton was here only communicating, with his typically unvarnished effortlessness, the crude and oblivious wellsprings of his religiosity. I have gained from his family, nonetheless, that his fixation on sex was no simple similitude. I trust in the end to recount that story, however lamentably it is past the extent of this book. Obviously a large portion of his proclaiming on sex took after the regular fundamentalist equation: physical want is sin, fornication is unsanitary and malicious, infidelity is of Satan, et cetera. Catholicism does likewise, with the apparent corruption of sex being the principle purpose behind the Immaculate Conception and the chastity of clerics and nuns. The two sections just cited are strange in that they grasp the passionate overflow into sexual region. Generally, religion censures it, in any event as an issue of teaching. However, why?
The huge issue here is that, notwithstanding this interruption of the sexual, religious feeling remains essentially juvenile, with God ordinarily in the part of an enormously lifted up parent. Sexual affections for this parental figure along these lines initiate the inbreeding shirking framework, a natural component that produces sentiments of appall and repugnance at the possibility of sex with close kinfolk. On account of the programmer's thoughtless alternate ways, the seriously devout have a tendency to be overwhelmed with adoration, desire, and aversion—clashing feelings of oblivious beginning, created by inborn instruments chose for neonatal survival, grown-up sexual match holding, and interbreeding evasion. The anticipated consequence of this contention is a fixation on controlling or prohibiting sexual conduct, combined with a practically overwhelming drive to disregard those preclusions. How these individuals manage this contention—as people and as religious organizations—decides the differently engaging or awful signs of sexual fixation in religion.
On the off chance that these thoughts are correct, at that point we ought to expect sexual rowdiness among the ministry to be essentially more prominent than in equivalent mainstream callings, and a few investigations bear this out. Two reviews of dominatingly male American Protestant clergymen found that more than 12 percent of respondents confessed to having sex with an individual from their gathering other than their life partner. This is generally twofold the occurrence of sex with customers submitted by male clinical therapists and doctors. The examinations likewise allude to a more broad issue of sexual clash, blame, and fixation. One of them found that 37 percent of Protestant clergymen admit to the dubious sin of "sexual conduct unseemly for a priest." Responses to different inquiries in the examination propose that in any event some of these transgressions include sexual dream, seeing explicit entertainment, and jerking off in private—demonstrations of immaterial result or good weight in the more extensive society.
The ministers, nonetheless, see it in an unexpected way. Their religiously twisted perspective of human sexuality is particularly clear in "The War Within," a record of one Protestant minister's tormented battle with desire, distributed namelessly in a diary for Protestant ministry. Despite the fact that he was hitched and frequently engaged in sexual relations with his significant other, the creator tells a miserable story of his fixation on different parts of sexuality forbidden to great Christians. Like Eve tasting the illegal natural product, he saw himself never-endingly enticed by Satan to enjoy his sexual interest—going to shabby strip joints, peep shows, and X-evaluated theaters; investigating pornographic magazines and recordings; and fantasizing about ladies other than his better half. Despite the fact that he never dedicated infidelity, he felt that he had, and for a considerable length of time he implored futile for deliverance. He specifies just in passing a "curbed adolescence" that may have added to his fixation on desire, yet past that gleam of understanding he shows up completely blinded by his religious perspective to the substance of his concern: desire is sound and ordinary, however a religious fixation on it isn't. "The War Within" is just a single bit of recounted prove, however the editors of the diary take note of that it provoked more letters from perusers, by a long shot, than some other article earlier or since. Some of these denounced it for its express lasciviousness, most adulated it for courageously tending to a typical issue in the church, however all implicitly bolster it as confirmation of a battle with affection, desire, and aversion among the most strongly religious.
That battle takes a darker turn among Catholic church, who are excessively prone to sexually mishandle helpless kids and teenagers. Catholic apologists deny this, frequently referring to an investigation that found that lone 4 percent of Catholic ministers sexually manhandle minors. They contend this is the same as in the general male populace, verifiably recommending that there is no uncommon connection amongst Catholicism and the sexual mishandle of youngsters. There are, in any case, a few issues with this justification. One is that different examinations find higher rates of tyke sexual mishandle in the Catholic church, more than 5 percent, and even that is probably going to be an underestimate given the hesitance of casualties to approach and the extreme exertion by the Catholic pecking order to secure culpable clerics and conceal the outrage. Another issue is the plausible correlation with the general male populace. The Catholic Church cases to be a high good expert—God's illustrative on Earth—and its ministry are as far as anyone knows changed by God into an extraordinary condition of sacredness. On the off chance that this were valid, we ought to expect model conduct from Catholic ministers, particularly as for the sexual manhandle of pure kids, a standout amongst the most terrible violations possible. On the off chance that the Catholic Church truly were what it ceases to be, the rate of kid sexual manhandle by clerics ought to be zero.
If we are able to develop tulpas and astral projections by using psychic abilities of our pineal gland, the third eye, why shouldn’t have Virgin Mary given birth to Jesus through astral projection? Perhaps Jesus was born miraculously through tulpamancy or astral projection of the Holy Spirit inside Virgin Mary’s mind resulting in her using her sixth chakra to give form to Jesus in this world.
