However, changes had occurred earlier than this such as in connection with the scientific/industrial revolutions, the French Revolution and other political revolutions and liberalisations, a gradually reduced influence of religion, the demographic transition, and movements such as Freudian psychoanalysis, Marxism, Boasian anthropology, and cultural Marxism which all criticized the traditional Western views.
The sexual revolution(s) have been criticized by various supporters of the traditional family, heterosexuality, and/or other traditional behaviors and various opponents of abortion, contraception, single parent families, homosexuality, pornography, race mixing, dysgenics, White demographic trends, and/or other new or increasing trends associated with sexual revolution(s). Such critics are often stereotyped as reactionary and religious conservatives but the criticisms may come from a variety of different groups who formulate different kinds of criticisms and who do not necessarily agree with one another on which aspects are seen as harmful or why.
| “ | Recruiting children? You bet we are. Why would we push anti-bullying programs or social studies classes that teach kids about the historical contributions of famous queers unless we wanted to deliberately educate children to accept queer sexuality as normal? I for one certainly want tons of school children to learn that it’s OK to be gay [sic], that people of the same sex should be allowed to legally marry each other, and that anyone can kiss a person of the same sex without feeling like a freak. And I would very much like for many of these young boys to grow up and start f***ing men. | ” |
—Daniel Villarreal, 2011, Queerty
| ||
| “ | Extending the subversive thesis, Jewish involvement in the X-rated industry can be seen as a proverbial two fingers to the entire WASP establishment in America. Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same WASPs), its subversive character becomes more charged. Porn is no longer of the ‘what the Butler saw’ voyeuristic type; instead, it is driven to new extremes of portrayal that stretch the boundaries of the porn aesthetic. | ” |
—Nathan Abrams, 2005, Jewish Quarterly.
| ||
| “ | Jews in America have been sexual revolutionaries. A large amount of the material on sexual liberation was written by Jews. Those at the forefront of the movement which forced America to adopt a more liberal view of sex were Jewish. Jews were also at the vanguard of the sexual revolution of the 1960s. Wilhelm Reich, Herbert Marcuse and Paul Goodman replaced Marx, Trotsky and Lenin as required revolutionary reading. Reich’s central preoccupations were work, love and sex, while Marcuse prophesied that a socialist utopia would free individuals to achieve sexual satisfaction. Goodman wrote of the "beautiful cultural consequences" that would follow from legalizing pornography: it would "ennoble all our art" and "humanize sexuality." | ” |
—Nathan Abrams, 2005, Jewish Quarterly.
| ||
| “ | Many early proponents viewed psychoanalysis as a redemptive messianic movement that would end anti-Semitism by freeing the world of neuroses produced by sexually repressive Western civilization. The cure for aggression characteristic of anti-Semitism was therefore believed to lie in freeing gentiles from their sexual repressions. Although Freud himself eventually developed the idea of a death instinct to explain aggression, a consistent theme of the Freudian critique of Western culture, as exemplified for example by Norman O. Brown, Herbert Marcuse, and Wilhelm Reich, has been that the liberation of sexual repressions would lead to lowered aggression and usher in an era of universal love. | ” |
—Kevin MacDonald, 1998, The Culture of Critique.
| ||
How Radical Jews Have Led the Making and Defense of Obscenity in America
Jews
in America have been fighters on the front lines in producing,
distributing, and defending pornography and obscenity for more than a
century, according to a new article published by the Jewish Tablet magazine.
The astonishing admission is made in a podcast interview with one of Tablet’s contributing editors, Josh Lambert, who is also a professor of English at the University of Massachusetts.
Interviewed about his new book Unclean Lips: Obscenity, Jews, and American Culture, Lambert said that stories about masturbation (as in Philip Roth’s infamous work Portnoy’s Complaint) and incest work as “metaphors for the struggles over Jewish continuity.”
According to Lambert, one of the reasons
why Jews are so involved in promoting obscenity is that it is linked to
“to fighting anti-Semitism.”
This is because the traditional
obscenity laws came from anti-vice crusaders of late 19th century, at
the time when large numbers of Jews were arriving in America, Lambert
said, and thus Jews opposed these laws because they saw them linked with
social discrimination against newcomers and Jews in particular.
This was linked to what Lambert
described as “sexual anti-Semitism,”, or the idea that Jews were
disproportionally involved in prostitution and the publishing of
pornography.
Another reason why Jews are so involved
in promoting obscenity, Lambert continued, was because of the Jewish
Holocaust in World War II.
“American lawyers,” he said, implying
that they are Jewish, “believe that minority discourse deserves
protection, and that the Holocaust was the ultimate suppression of
minorities. The fight for free speech became a fight for minority
rights,” Lambert said.
“A less noble reason,” he continued, was
that some Jews, especially those who founded the major publishing
houses (and he named three: Randolph House, Simon & Shuster, and
Viking Press) found that by publishing pornography they could “gain
prestige” for doing something that other publishers would not do.
Referring specifically to Roth’s book, Portnoy’s Complaint, Lambert said the infamous masturbation scenes contained therein are actually metaphors for Jewish behabior.
“The
masturbation is about what do you do as a Jew in the modern world,
either you marry a Jew or you go out and chase a shiksa,” he said,
adding that “masturbation is kind of a half way between fathering a
child (with a Gentile) which will have problems.”
According to his book description,
“Jews have
played an integral role in the history of obscenity in America. For most
of the 20th century, Jewish entrepreneurs and editors led the charge
against obscenity laws. Jewish lawyers battled literary censorship even
when their non-Jewish counterparts refused to do so . . . Jewish
literary critics have provided some of the most influential courtroom
testimony on behalf of freedom of expression.
“The
anti-Semitic stereotype of the lascivious Jew has made many historians
hesitant to draw a direct link between Jewishness and obscenity. In Unclean Lips,
Josh Lambert addresses the Jewishness of participants in obscenity
controversies in the U.S. directly, exploring the transformative roles
played by a host of neglected figures in the development of modern and
postmodern American culture.”
* Another interpretation for the Jewish
preponderance in obscenity and pornography was provided by Nathan
Abrams, a Lecturer in Modern American History at the University of
Aberdeen. In an article in the Jewish Quarterly, Abrams
said that the overwhelmingly Jewish role in producing pornography in
America “can be seen as a proverbial two fingers to the entire WASP
establishment in America.
“Some porn
stars viewed themselves as frontline fighters in the spiritual battle
between Christian America and secular humanism . . . Jewish X-rated
actors often brag about their ‘joy in being anarchic, sexual gadflies to
the puritanical beast’. Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument,
is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are
trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion,”
Abram wrote.
“Al Goldstein, the publisher of Screw, said
‘The only
reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks.
Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism.’”
Abrams went on to state that “It is a
case of the traditional revolutionary/radical drive of immigrant Jews in
America being channelled into sexual rather than leftist politics.
“Just as Jews have been
disproportionately represented in radical movements over the years, so
they are also disproportionately represented in the porn industry. Jews
in America have been sexual revolutionaries. A large amount of the
material on sexual liberation was written by Jews.
“Those at the forefront of the movement
which forced America to adopt a more liberal view of sex were Jewish.
Jews were also at the vanguard of the sexual revolution of the 1960s.
Wilhelm Reich, Herbert Marcuse and Paul Goodman replaced Marx, Trotsky
and Lenin as required revolutionary reading. Reich’s central
preoccupations were work, love and sex, while Marcuse prophesied that a
socialist utopia would free individuals to achieve sexual satisfaction.
“Goodman wrote of the ‘beautiful
cultural consequences’ that would follow from legalizing pornography: it
would ‘ennoble all our art’ and ‘humanize sexuality,’” Abrams said.
Freud’s Campaign To Destroy Western Civilization Continues
In 1856, Sigismund Schlomo Freud was born in Freiberg (modern day Czech Republic).
He was a psychologist and developed theories about the unconscious mind and the effects of
“sexual repression”.
But what was the REAL purpose of Freud’s work?
In 1899, Freud wrote “The Interpretation of Dreams” which explained his goal to conquer Europe:
“Hannibal, whom I had come to resemble in these respects, had been the favorite hero of my later school days. Like so many boys of that age, I had sympathized not with the Romans but with the Carthaginians. And when in the higher classes I began to understand for the first time what it meant to belong to an alien race, and anti-Semitic feelings among the other boys warned me that I must take up a definite position, the figure of the Semitic general rose still higher in my esteem. To my youthful mind Hannibal and Rome symbolized the tenacity of Jewry and the organization of the Catholic Church.”
Freud added he was motivated by the “scene in which Hannibal’s father, Hamilcar Barva, made his boy swear before the household altar to take vengeance on the Roman. Ever since that time, Hannibal had had a place in my fantasies.”
In other words, Freud fantacized about destroying European society.
Freud was inspired by Hannibal because he also wanted to conquer Europe.
Freud’s campaign however was not a military attack on a government but a psychological attack on a culture.
His goal was to destroy Catholic morality and defeat traditional European culture.
Freud’s psychological theories were formed by his own dreams and childhood memories. He claimed he remembered hating his father and was convinced he had sexual feelings towards his mother.
Freud later wrote “I found in myself a constant love for my mother, and jealousy of my father. I now consider this to be a universal event in childhood”.
Freud hoped to prove his personal experience was widespread. He named his new theory the Oedipus complex after the Greek tragedy Oedipus Rex by Sophocles.
The Oedipus theory claims people naturally desire incest and must repress that desire.
Freud argued the Oedipus complex was bisexual, with a sexual attraction to both parents.
Freud claimed humans sexually develop in stages of progression. He believed each “stage” was a progression toward adult sexual “maturity”.
First Stage: oral stimulation (Freud’s infant pleasure in nursing)
Second Stage: anal stimulation (Freud’s childhood pleasure in using the restroom)
Third Stage: phallic stage (Freud’s teenage pleasure in masturbation)
Freud claimed children need the proper amount of satisfaction at each stage to move forward to the next stage of development.
In other words, he argued infants need sexual experiences to “mature”.
In 1997, Camilla Paglia wrote in Salon Magazine that Freud “shockingly established that sexuality does not begin at puberty but in childhood and even infancy”.
Freud’s revolutionary vision has been accomplished. Children have been sexualized, the family has been damaged, and traditional morality largely forgotten.
His theories influenced a whole new generation of Jewish intellectuals that spread his ideas.
Freud’s theories inspired future Jewish psychologist Wilhelm Reich, who created and spread the term “Sexual Revolution” in 1930.
In 2004, Jewish author Nathan Abrams wrote in “The Jewish Quarterly” that “Jews were also at the vanguard of the sexual revolution in the 1960’s. Wilhelm Reich, Herbret Marcuse, and Paul Goodman replaced Marx, Trotsky, and Lenin as required revolutionary reading. Pacheco was one of the Jewish porn stars that read Reich’s intellectual marriage of Freud and Marx.”
Abrams also refers to an interview with Al Goldstein, the Jewish publisher of Screw Magazine who claimed “the only reason Jews are in pornography is that we think Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks, we don’t believe in authoritarianism. Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture”.
Abrams claims that “Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument is the result of an atavistic hatred of hatred of Christian authority. They are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion.”
Sound familiar?
The “Sexual Revolution” is the continuation of Freud’s campaign to promote Judaism and destroy Western Civilization.
This article is part one of “The Jews Behind Modern Culture” series:
Introduction: JnJ Presents “The Jews Behind Modern Culture”
Sigmund Freud: The Jew Behind The Sexual Revolution
Karl Marx: The Jew Behind Communism
Betty Friedan: The Jew Behind Feminism
Albert Einstein: The Jew Behind Modern Science
George Soros: The Jew Behind The Democratic Party
William Kristol: The Jew Behind The Neocons
Lou Pearlman: The Jew Behind The Boybands
David Stern: The Jew That Runs Basketball
Bud Selig: The Jew That Runs Baseball
Mark Zuckerberg: The Jew Behind Facebook
Ben Bernanke: The Jew Behind The Federal Reserve
Ray Kurzweil: The Jew Behind Transhumanism
