United
States of North America may refer to: A term used before 11 July 1778
to refer to the United States of America.
No
nation exists forever. Things change. Borders change. People get
diversified. Religions evolve. New races emerge out of interracial
intergasms. USA will not live on forever. God will not bless USA
forever. USA has existed — in various forms — since 1776 AD. Its
borders will change. Either you evolve or devolve. USA has to evolve
— in order to survive and become better. Time for USNA, "United
States of North America" — an e-Direct Democracy that is much
better than the current bipartisan — corrupted and pointless —
representative democracy
The
political environment in present day America is bleak. It is
pointless. Corrupt rich elitist politicians rule this country. We
need a change. We need the power to go back to the people instead of
the ruling monopolist oligarchic pseudo-fascist politicians — who
are themselves owned and controlled by the hidden powers that
actually control the world.
Instead
of not doing anything about it, we the people need to force a change
in the system. We need an American revolution that will change
America, and then the world. We need e-direct democracy. This is an
age of twitter, instagram, facebook, snapchat, and other apps. We can
simply develop an app through which people can register in to vote
ONLINE — without any possibility of election rigging or hacking by
the Russians — and the people get to decide the policies,
amendments to the constitutions, and everything else that the corrupt
politicians get bribed to modify to whoever pays them to do their
bidding.
How
about an APP named "E-Vote"?
You
would vote for a particular person from the public — who is willing
to do it — to represent the people who voted for them? And their
job is only to work as servants of the public. The public decides the
policies. The public is the judge, jury and the executioner. The
public decides who the next judge is. The public decides whether a
person is guilty or not. Everything is online. Everyone is involved.
Every citizen of United States of North America has access to the
internet and all the facilities that are basic human needs. No more
homeless people. No need for jobs. Most of the work is done by the
machines. Everyone gets to have basic welfare and healthcare. If they
want to get rich, sure go ahead!
But
every citizen is equal in the eyes of the law. Every citizen has
basic welfare income of 50,000 USNA dollars or more.
It
would be technocratic. Those qualified for the job would be allowed
to be put in the list of eligible candidates, and people would vote
them in or out. There would be an e-Senate. There would be an
e-Congress. There would be e-High Courts. e-Supreme Courts.
There
would be no power structure. Switzerland has a form of direct
democracy. But it is not electronic yet.
No
more Bill Clinton. No more Obama. No more George Bush. No more
Hillary Clinton. No more Donald Trump. No more Chelsea Clinton or
Ivanka Trump. Yes folks, Ivanka and Chelsea will compete each other
for the Presidency in the near future. I don't like a future in which
dynasties rule the world. There shouldn't be a British monarchy.
There shouldn't be arabic kingdoms. If we believe in true democracy,
then e-direct democracy is the true democracy of the future.
This
would be a world in which Hyper-Capitalism and Hyper-Socialism
co-exist and form a bond. It will be complex. It will be glorious.
People will watch technocrats on live feeds, and they get to decide
who is capable and who isn't, and they get to vote the incompetent
people out!
Politics
will be an E-Reality TV/Internet; the ordinary people will be more
involved than ever.
Every
citizen will have basic private property that he/she/it can increase
the numbers of.
Mexico
The
borders will remain, but heavy investment will happen in Mexico,
modernizing the country for the next 100 years. If Mexico becomes as
good as USA, then Mexican territories will be incorporated and
Mexican States will be the new states of United States of North
America.
Canada
The
border will remain, and the hyper-liberals can move up and down from
USA to Canada and back. Single Passport. Those who are conservative
can move down from Canada to USA and live in the 'red states'.
I
think we all know that borders are man-made. I imagine a future in
which there is a One World Government, and the rich elites aren't
controlling the resources of this beautiful planet. Every human being
will be controlling it!
We
will then look forward to exploring Space and settling in other
planets of the nearest habitable galaxies. The future is bright. Do
not get bogged down by the few elites who want to rule everything and
ruin the fun for the rest of us.
The
Currency
The
hypothetical currency for the union is most often referred to as the
amero.
The concept is modeled on the common European Union currency (the
euro).
NAFTA
E-majority
rule government, in full electronic popular government, the
utilization of data and correspondence innovations to improve and in
a few records supplant agent vote based system.
Scholars
of e-majority rule government contrast, yet most offer the conviction
that a portion of as far as possible to citizenship in contemporary
liberal-vote based nations—issues of scale, shortage of time,
decrease of group, and absence of chances for approach
consultation—can be overwhelmed by new types of online
correspondence.
Hypothetical
beginnings
An
unmistakable collection of thoughts shapes the scenery to e-vote
based system in both hypothesis and practice. Amid the 1960s an era
of political scholars, including Benjamin Hair stylist, C.B.
Macpherson, and Carole Pateman, set up a motivation for participatory
majority rule government that persevered well into the 21st century.
Amid
the 1980s numerous sociologists and political researchers reevaluated
the idea of group. A few, for example, Robert Bellah and associates,
weeped over the escalation of independence in American culture and
required another communitarian ethic. Others, for example, Amitai
Etzioni, contended for forceful, sincerely effective group bonds
based around family and region.
The
last hypothetical motivation for e-vote based system is Jürgen
Habermas' idea of the general population circle: an admired
self-sufficient circle of correspondence in which nationals can
uninhibitedly participate in contemplated talk about far from the
controlling impact of the state, extensive media enterprises, and
structures of social disparity. The possibility of nationals
pondering in unreservedly shaped relationship in common society
before taking that information up to the level of government reviews
the immediate popular government of old Athens, yet e-vote based
system refreshes this by concentrating on how political talk is
intervened. The Web rises as a correspondence medium extraordinarily
suited to giving various fields to open level headed discussion that
are generally unconstrained, adaptable, and, most importantly,
self-represented.
Group
systems
Group
arranges first developed amid the 1970s however multiplied in
numerous liberal majority rule governments amid the 1990s as the
expenses of programming, PCs, and systems administration hardware
started to fall. Early systems, for example, the Berkeley People
group Memory Venture close San Francisco and the Santa Clause Monica
Open Electronic System close Los Angeles, utilized fundamental
innovations, for example, content based notice sheets, email, and
free terminals in physical open spaces, for example, stores, group
focuses, and libraries. Most people group systems are open private
plans that consolidate three fundamental components: a rapid system
offered gratis or at a sponsored rate to families; some type of group
innovation focus, frequently situated in a group building; and an
accentuation on making content particular to the nearby group.
Comparative
Themes
coordinate
popular government
democratization
law
based deficiency
urban
limit
consociationalism
deliberative
popular government
parliamentary
popular government
majoritarianism
Group
systems depend on the possibility that by giving to common
individuals the ability to shape the generation of online data about
their nearby neighborhood, virtual groups can enhance geological
groups by making new social ties and corresponding put stock in, the
elements of social capital.
From
people group to governmental issues
Some
e-popular government ventures have endeavored to interface informal
organizations with more extensive political procedures while staying
autonomous of government, gatherings, or intrigue gatherings.
Preeminent among these is Minnesota E-Vote based system (later
E-Democracy.org), which was set up in 1994 and wound up plainly one
of the world's biggest subnational-level political dialog
discussions.
In
the mid 21st century there was a critical move toward endeavoring to
connect online systems to formal political procedures. Focal and
nearby government organizations and additionally councils gradually
yet clearly begun to explore different avenues regarding on the web
approach exchanges and subject counsels. These activities endeavored
to give an extension between casual online considerations among
nationals and structures of administration that furnish an interface
with "genuine" basic leadership forms. The deliberative
hand over administration has just produced a scope of non-Web
strategies for including residents in arrangement making, for
example, natives' juries, people groups' boards, nearby approach
gatherings, center gatherings, small scale submissions, and
petitions. E-vote based activities bring the Web in with the general
mish-mash. These have by and large taken after two expansive models:
consultative and deliberative.
Test
Your Insight
The
Senate moved into its present chamber in the north wing of the U.S.
State house in Washington, D.C., in 1859.
Structures
of Government: Truth or Fiction?
Consultative
methodologies push the correspondence of resident supposition to
government. The suspicion is that data is an asset that can be
utilized to give better approach and organization. Presumably the
best case of the consultative model in real life is the U.S. national
government's e-lead making program. This is intended to permit
intrigue gatherings and individual nationals to remark on office and
office leads as they are being produced.
Britannica
Stories
Demystified/Science
What
Is a Delayed repercussion?
Safeguard
group scanning for casualties caught under the trash in the fallout
of the extent 7.2 quake that struck close Van, Turkey, on October 23,
2011.
Spotlight/History
Ruler
Elizabeth's Court Soothsayer
'John
Dee playing out an examination before Ruler Elizabeth I' by Henry
Gillard Glindoni. Oil painting eighteenth century. Pentimento,
mysterious, divination, enchantment.
Spotlight/Geology
A
Trillion Tons of Antarctica Fell into the Ocean
In
late August 2016, daylight come back to the Antarctic Promontory and
divulged a break over the Larsen C Ice Retire that had developed
longer and more profound over the austral winter
Demystified/Science
What
Causes Tidal waves?
Carefully
changed picture of torrent waves clearing over city (advanced
adjustment; catastrophic event)
Deliberative
models consider a more intricate, even, and multidirectional
intuitiveness. The Unified Kingdom was a pioneer in trial endeavors
to coordinate online deliberative gatherings straightforwardly into
arrangement talks. The U.K's. Hansard Society led a few trials from
the late 1990s, including an exchange on surge administration, a
pathbreaking gathering on encounters of abusive behavior at home
including more than 200 ladies in intelligent dialog, and an online
confirmation and discourse discussion on the 2002 draft Interchanges
Bill. The last was the principal certified endeavor to incorporate an
online discussion with a built up parliamentary council.
E-popular
government has incited much hypothetical exchange. However, its
primary topics are progressively installed in political practice.
They have been cherished in a wide assortment of national and
neighborhood tests, in a wide range of settings, utilizing
distinctive types of PC intervened correspondence, in nations as
different as Australia, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France,
Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Sweden.
Could
an Assembled Conditions of North America Lift the US and Canada?
Merger
of the Century: Why Canada and America Should Wind up noticeably One
Nation
On
the off chance that you were tired of the resoluteness of the Casual
get-together's followers amid the national government's shutdown,
there is no reason for positive thinking by its determination. The
framework could again be seized in a couple of months by a little bit
of one of two gatherings in one of the three branches of the
administration. A framework that allows this has profound blemishes.
The
issue may appear to be insoluble. Individuals from the Place of
Agents, more than some other government legislators, are under
obligation to lobbyists and the cash they infuse into the framework.
Youth voting is declining and an ever increasing number of youngsters
are picking contrasting options to popularity based establishments to
realize change. As individuals wherever turn out to be more
pessimistic there is a national emergency of authenticity for
majority rules system really taking shape, and tempest notices of
more concerning issues.
All
of a sudden is a humble proposition to take care of this and other
profound issues confronting America. (Before you read promote it's
most likely best in case you're taking a seat.)
The
arrangement may be to have the Unified States and Canada meet up to
frame one nation where the benefits of each and the procedure of a
merger may settle some unmanageable difficulties they both face.
This
is the proposition of top of the line writer, author, savant and
double national of the U.S. also, Canada, Diane Francis. In her new
book, Merger of the Century: Why Canada and America Should Wind up
plainly One Nation, Francis sets out the monetary advantages of
uniting, how the arrangement could be genuinely organized, and the
political obstacles to overcome.
In
the event that the formation of the European Union is prove, exchange
assentions, regular markets and financial unions can prompt political
unions. So it's not all that absurd that 20 years after the marking
of the North American Organized commerce Understanding, somebody has
at long last made a genuine proposition for political joining of
Canada and the Unified States.
Francis
begins by expressing the self-evident. Once an unrivaled monetary
superpower, the present America is feeble. The Worldwide Money
related Store figures that China, India, Japan and the four Asian
Tigers — South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong will be
greater than the G8 (less Japan) by 2018.
She
cites Andy Stern, a previous union pioneer, who contends that "In
a time when nations should be financial groups, Group USA's outcomes
— a jobless decade, 30 years of level middle wages, an exchange
deficiency, a contracting white collar class and remarkable picks up
in riches yet just for the best 1 percent — are regrettable."
In
building the case for unification, Francis says Canada's greatest
quality is its "psyche boggling" abundance of assets. With
the assistance of a petrologist from the Geological Study of Canada,
she appraises that Canada has between $9 trillion to $15 trillion
worth of metals minerals still to be found and created. Include the
multiplier impact from discovering, constructing and working mines
and the essential framework and additionally enhancing the products,
this sum would dramatically increase.
To
supplement these assets, Canada has a strong keeping money framework,
a solid association with the U.S., more complex social esteems and
frameworks and an informed, well behaved individuals.
Francis
contends that the U.S's. most noteworthy upper hand is its way of
life of hazard taking and enterprise. American dispositions
de-slander mishaps and disappointments by business people working in
compliance with common decency, while different countries or
societies rebuff any disappointment. The Assembled States is the main
country with the capital, logical ability and inspiration to build up
Canada's tremendous wild in a reasonable and dependable way. Canada's
assets and the Cold district — bound to be "the world's future
Panama and Suez channels" — would give "mind blowing
openings."
A
consolidated U.S. what's more, Canada would have a bigger economy
than the European Union or the economies of Japan, China, Germany and
France joined. The U.S.- Canada combo would control more oil, water,
arable land and assets than whatever other nation, all ensured by
America's considerable military. Nationals of the blended nations
would have more alternatives as far as occupations, atmospheres,
studies and ways of life.
Francis
lays out the financial matters of a few merger situations and in
addition approaches for political reconciliation, for example, the
Full Monty German reunification grasped by the past West and East
Germany. Another choice is making a meta-state like the European
Union — where Canada and the U.S. would proceed as discrete
political elements.
Francis
yields that blending would be hard however demands it would be
justified regardless of the agony. With the infusion of a huge number
of Canadian voters into the American political framework, the
legislative issues of the bound together nation would move to one
side of where the U.S. is today. A Republican president would be more
outlandish. What's more, during the time spent unification, the U.S.
could change its political framework to grasp a large number of the
upsides of Canada's parliamentary structure, with the official and
authoritative branches going about as one.
Francis
utilizes financial information to abrade both the U.S. human services
framework and Canada's treatment of native rights. She parodies
American fear of government and Canada's lack of concern about
barrier. She doesn't recoil, exhibiting a financial asset report that
post-merger legitimizes a $15 trillion payout to Canadians.
Francis
portrays her book as a "thought investigation," and it is
all around recorded and soundly contended. Summoning a rich
information of world political and monetary history, she paints a
convincing woven artwork that is difficult to reject.
Some
underlying scrutinizes of the book have contended that the
possibility of political union is not practical given altogether
different mentalities North and South of the verge on everything from
guns to political frameworks and war. As one commentator asked: "And
shouldn't something be said about America's crazy war on drugs: How
might ski bums at Whistler endure seeing SWAT groups and sniffer
canines plunging on their pot parties?"
Such
complaints would be army, and many would basically reject the
proposition as hogwash. Be that as it may, as somebody who has
contended for profound change in a number of society's foundations,
I've generally put protests to change in one of two cans. Container
#1 is "motivations to not do this" and can #2 is the
"execution challenges." If Americans and Canadians were to
choose unification was worth examining, complaints would go into the
second basin. Surprisingly, she perceives these hindrances, citing
Subside Drucker that "culture has system for breakfast."
We
as a whole deserve to venture back and reflect profoundly about the
unpredictable time of history we are entering. To me, in the event
that it propels flourishing, supportability and equity, at that point
no proposition is excessively over the top, making it impossible to
consider.
This
rearranged show represents e-majority rules system exercises all in
all. Expanding on the primary graph it, sits as a channel on the
"info" outskirt amongst subjects and administration in
first chart:
Governments
give broad access to data and connect electronically with natives,
political gatherings run online support crusades and political
gatherings battle on the web, and the media and entry/seek locales
assume a vital part in giving news and online route. In this model,
the "Private Division" speaks to economically determined
availability, programming, and innovation. This is the entire of
e-vote based system.
E-majority
rule government is not developing in a vacuum with these parts as it
were. Innovation improvements and online patterns from all sides of
the Web are consistently being embraced and adjusted for political
and administration purposes. This is one of the all the more
energizing open doors as email, remote systems administration,
personalization, weblogs, and different apparatuses move in from
other online substance, business, and innovation ranges and bring
development and the open door for change with them.
Looking
to the focal point of model, the main ones who encounter "e-majority
rule government" in general may be "subjects." In more
"wired" nations most residents are encountering data age
vote based system as "e-natives" at some level of
administration and open life. In creating nations, e-vote based
system is similarly as vital, yet exists as a greater amount of a
foundation to-organization relationship. In all nations, the impact
of "e-vote based system" really achieves a large portion of
the general population through its impact on the customary media and
through informal exchange by means of compelling individuals from the
group.
"E-Natives"
- More prominent Resident Support?
To
numerous, e-vote based system recommends more noteworthy and more
dynamic subject cooperation empowered by the Web, versatile
interchanges, and different advances in the present agent majority
rule government. It likewise proposes an alternate part for
government and more participatory types of direct resident inclusion
in endeavors to address open difficulties. (Think e-volunteerism over
e-voting.)
Some
take this further and view the data insurgency as a naturally
popularity based "problematic innovation" that will
drastically improve legislative issues. This view has decreased
extensively, as existing vote based performing artists have shown
their capacity to consolidate new advancements and online
correspondence procedures into their own particular exercises and
secure their current advantages. They need to so as to survive.
Later
on, most "e-majority rules system" improvement will
normally come about because of ICT-quickened rivalry among the
different political powers in the public arena. We are encountering a
sensational "e-majority rule government development." In
this advancement, the part, interests, and the present and future
exercises of all on-screen characters is not yet surely knew. There
is as yet a chance to impact its improvement to improve things.
Things
will change, however as each fair area propels their online
exercises, popularity based goal will be required to accomplish the
more prominent objectives of vote based system.
Related
assets:
E-Popular
government Asset Connections
Eventual
fate of E-Vote based system - The Fifty Year Design
E-Popular
government digital book: Majority rule government is Online 2.0
E-Administration
I
utilize the expression "Delegate E-Government" to depict
the e-majority rules system exercises of government foundations.
Others call this "e-administration." Regardless of whether
a nearby government or a Unified Countries office, government
foundations are making critical interests in the utilization of ICTs
in their work. They are communicating "fair expectation."
Their endeavors make this a standout amongst the most unique and
vital territories of e-vote based system advancement.
There
are unmistakable contrasts in how illustrative organizations and
chose authorities utilize ICTs contrasted with managerial offices and
offices. The utilization of ICTs by parliaments, heads of
state/government, and nearby chambers (and chose authorities in these
establishments) lingers fundamentally behind the managerial based
e-taxpayer supported organization and entry endeavors. This is an
administrations in the first place, majority rules system later
approach.
This
concentrate of e-government assets on administrations does not imply
that e-vote based system is not increasing expanded consideration in
a few governments. Indeed, driving e-benefit governments are
presently at a point where they are investigating their e-majority
rule government obligations all the more truly.
Objectives
for E-Majority rule government in Administration
Interest
in customary e-taxpayer driven organization conveyance is legitimized
in view of the arrangement of more prominent resident accommodation
and the regularly subtle objective of cost-reserve funds. Objectives
for e-government in administration that advance majority rule
government and powerful administration include:
1.
Enhanced government choices
2.
Expanded native trust in government
3.
Expanded government responsibility and straightforwardness
4.
Capacity to oblige the general population will in the data age
5.
To adequately include partners, including NGOs, business, and
intrigued national in better approaches for addressing open
difficulties (see open net-work beneath)
Conference
On the web
The
principal range of government e-majority rules system investigation
has concentrated on interview inside official arrangement making
forms. Governments, similar to the Assembled Kingdom and Canada, are
taking their consultative structures and adjusting them to the online
condition. New Zealand and Canada now have uncommon entrances devoted
to advance the open conferences over their legislatures. This
incorporates customary disconnected open doors and in addition those
where online info is empowered. Over the UK, various "online
discussions" have been conveyed to accumulate uncommon subject
info by means of the Web.
Illustrations:
Counseling
Canadians: http://www.consultingcanadians.gc.ca
New
Zealand – Take an interest: http://www.govt.nz/en/take part
UK
E-Majority rule government Counsel: http://www.e-democracy.gov.uk
Others,
including facilitating and best practice tips:
http://www.publicus.net/articles/consult.html
Responsibility,
Confide in, The general population Will
These
three topics are rising on the e-majority rule government motivation.
Building government responsibility and straightforwardness are a
critical concentration of e-government in many creating nations.
E-government is seen an against defilement instrument in places like
South Korea, Mexico, and others. Trust, while a vital objective, must
be measured in theory. Building up a causal connection between
e-government/e-vote based system encounters and expanded levels of
trust will be troublesome.
Eventually,
the principle challenge for administration in the data age will be
obliging the will of the general population in numerous little and
extensive ways on the web. The immense obscure is whether native and
political institutional utilization of this new medium will prompt
more responsive government or whether the commotion produced by
contending intrigues online will make administration more
troublesome. It is conceivable that present utilization of ICTs in
government and legislative issues, which are frequently not detailed
with fair purpose, will really make administration less responsive.
One
thing is clear, the Web can be utilized to successfully compose
challenges and to help particular backing causes. Regardless of
whether it was the utilization of email gatherings and content
informing dissenting previous President Estrada of the Philippines or
the reality a greater part of Americans online sent or got email (for
the most part diversion) after the Presidential race "tie"
in the Unified States, significant crossroads in history prompt a
blast of online action. The informal organizations online are
extremely powerful and governments should be set up to suit and
respond to "electric surges." When something happens that
causes a surge, individuals will anticipate that administration will
draw in them by means of this medium or residents will rather see
government as progressively lethargic and detached with society they
are to serve.
Related
assets:
For
additional on the e-government and majority rules system, look for
the 2003 Joined Countries World Open Part Report. Subtle elements
will be shared on DoWire: http://www.e-democracy.org/do
Top
Ten E-Majority rules system "Schedule" for Governments
Around the globe
Top
Ten Hints for "Weos" - Wired Chose Authorities
Open
Net-Work
Open
net-work is another idea. It speaks to the key utilization of ICTs to
better execute built up open approach objectives and projects through
immediate and differing partner contribution on the web.
In
the event that e-popular government in government speaks to enter
into administration, at that point open net-work speaks to
participative yield utilizing the same or comparable online
instruments. Open net-work is a specific, yet open, approach that
utilizations two-way online data trade to do beforehand decided
government strategy.
Expanding
on the main chart, the accompanying "tie" display proposes
a more liquid correspondence condition that can be accustomed to
bring subjects and open work partners nearer to the focal point of
administration. It likewise proposes that arrangement pioneers can
connect and grow nearer associations with subjects and partners.
E-Vote
based system Beginning stages
Often
refreshed online assets with connections and declarations
specifically identified with e-majority rule government from over the
Web:
Majority
rules systems Online Newswire
http://www.dowire.org
DoWire
is a noteworthy blog/email declaration list on e-majority rules
system, e-government and the sky is the limit from there.
E-Vote
based system and E-Government Sites
http://www.dowire.org/nourishes
Many
related web journals and news encourages
E-Majority
rule government digital book and related articles
http://www.publicus.net
Steven
Clift's diagram of e-vote based system and many articles with broad
connections.
Advancement
Entryway - E-Government
http://topics.developmentgateway.org/e-government
Additionally
observe Learning Economy, ICTs for Improvement
Sight
and sound Victoria's eGov Asset Ctr
http://www.egov.vic.gov.au
For
joins from an administrative point of view, select "EDemocracy"
in the "Patterns and Issues."
Sociology
Data Portal
http://www.sosig.ac.uk/governmental
issues
Select
"Political Correspondence" for various reports and
articles.
Governmental
issues On the web
http://www.politicsonline.com
Politicker
and Netpulse e-bulletins contain news joins concentrated on the
political utilization of the Web.
Teledemocracy.Org
Connections
http://itc.napier.ac.uk/ITC/links.asp
Likewise
observe their productions and toolbox.
UK's
E-Government Announcement
http://www.headstar.com/egb
E-bulletin
additionally covering "teledemocracy."
College
of St. Gallen's EGov Center
http://www.electronic-government.ch
Refreshed
with new articles and connections in numerous dialects every week.
Government
Online Natural Output
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/ig-gi/gs-compact
disc/es-ae/es-ae_e.asp
Day
by day connects accumulated by Canadian Government
Content
Villiage - eGov Asset Center
http://www.content-village.org/articles.asp?id=170
Assets
from crosswise over Europe and past
Politik-Advanced's
E-Demokratie
http://www.politik-digital.de/edemocracy
German
point of view and investigation
NetPolitique
http://www.netpolitique.net
French
pamphlet and assets
EGov
Blog Roll
http://slashdemocracy.org/gotzespace
Dr.
John Gotze's weblog incorporates broad e-gov blog joins.
Form
3.0, Walk 23, 2006 - Current adaptation at:
http://publicus.net/articles/edemresources.html
Ordered
by Steven Clift, http://publicus.net
Brief
E-Majority rule government Definition
E-majority
rule government speaks to the utilization of data and correspondence
advancements and techniques by vote based on-screen characters inside
political and administration procedures of nearby groups, countries
and on the worldwide stage. Majority rule performers/divisions
incorporate governments, chose authorities, the media, political
associations, and native/voters.
To
numerous, e-majority rules system recommends more prominent and more
dynamic subject investment empowered by the Web, portable
correspondences, and different innovations in the present agent
popular government and additionally through more participatory or
direct types of national contribution in tending to open
difficulties. – Steven Clift
¨
Brisk
Connects to Choose Topical Assets
Online
Discussion
http://www.publicus.net/articles/consult.html
http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/onlineconsultation
http://www.bowlingtogether.net
http://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/eDemocracy.htm
OECD's
Subjects as Accomplices Guide, and so on.
http://www.deliberative-democracy.net/
E-Rundown:
http://groups.dowire.org/gatherings/counsel
Driving
Governments on E-Vote based system
http://www.publicus.net/e-government
http://www.e-democracy.gov.uk
http://www.getinvolved.qld.gov.au
- more
http://dowire.org/wiki/UK_highlights
http://dowire.org/wiki/Briefs
http://www.governments-online.org
Parliaments
Online – Agent E-Majority rule government
http://www.ncsl.org/programs/lis/cip/ciphome.htm
http://www.ncsl.org/programs/lis/nalit
http://www.congressonlineproject.org
http://dowire.org/wiki/Online_Committee_Room
Electronic
Voting
http://www.social-informatics.net/evoting.htm
http://www.calvoter.org/issues/votingtech
http://www.upassoc.org/upa_projects/voting_and_usability
http://www.votingtechnologyproject.org/links.htm
http://lorrie.cranor.org/voting/hotlist.html
E-Rundown:
http://groups.yahoo.com/gathering/upa-evoting
E-Rundown:
http://lists.hss.caltech.edu/listinfo/votingtech
Internet
Battling
http://www.ipdi.org
http:/www.politicalweb.info
http://www.voxpolitics.com/primer.shtml
(UK)
http://www.campaignadvantage.com
E-Rundown:
http://groups.yahoo.com/gathering/do-campnet
Online
Promotion and Campaigning
http://www.backspace.com/activity
http://www.network-centricadvocacy.net
http://www.policymagic.org/electron.htm
http://www.npaction.org/article/articleview/98
http://www.benton.org/publibrary/toolboxs/stratcommtool.html
http://www.techsoup.org/articlepage.cfm?ArticleId=184
http://www.summitcollaborative.com/resources.html
http://news.gilbert.org/jewel
E-List:http://groups.yahoo.com/gathering/electronicadvocacy
E-Government
Exploration
http://europa.eu.int/information_society/soccul/egov/index_en.htm
http://www.digitalgovernment.org
http://europa.eu.int/idabc/en/part/140
http://www.ctg.albany.edu
http://www.demo-net.org
Fate
of (Political) News On the web
http://www.ojr.org
http://www.poynter.org/subject.asp?id=264
E-Rundown:
http://poynteronline.org/content/content_view.asp?id=9380
Effect
of Weblogs, Social Programming
http://joi.ito.com/joiwiki/EmergentDemocracy
http://www.theisociety.net
http://www.mysociety.org
We
need to evolve
from bipartisan
bullshit politics to
direct
democracy
using the internet.
The future is now.
United
States of
North America
That
is my dream.
